Different Essay Topics For Same Sex Marriage Essay Topics

Different Essay Topics For Same Sex Marriage Essay TopicsA number of themes can be used for writing a same sex marriage essay topic. Some topics include how the institution of marriage is changing as young adults are learning about same sex marriages, what benefits and disadvantages of a same sex marriage entails, and what the changes might mean for the institution of marriage itself.One theme can be to educate youth on the advantages and disadvantages of same sex marriage. This can be done by allowing them to ask questions or be interactive. Parents, siblings, friends, or anyone else close to the couple could give their opinions on the topic.The essay topic should not be too complex because there are many different reasons that people might not be comfortable talking about these issues with someone else. Reading through articles and other relevant information can help in this area.When choosing essay topics, remember that only some will be able to answer each question correctly. It' s also important to make sure that the essay topic matches the desires of the participants. Are they aiming to support same sex couples who want to stay together, or is it a topic of praise for those couples who are married? Asking questions and seeking advice from parents, friends, and schoolmates are all important parts of this essay topic.Themes are not the only thing to consider when researching essay topics. The questions that need to be answered vary from person to person. Every person's circumstances are different and there may be varying answers to the same question, which makes it difficult to come up with an essay topic that has a specific purpose.Each student has their own way of approaching the subject. Some are more analytical and organized, while others want to take it on their own. A good mixture of all of these styles will make for a great essay topic.Some essay topics can also include discussions of how different people view same sex relationships. How does one side see a relationship between two people who have one of the same sexes? Can people feel uncomfortable with these marriages?Theme topics can be chosen for any number of reasons. From simple and easy ones to deep and detailed, essay topics are open to everyone.

8 Common Spelling Errors to Check For!

8 Common Spelling Errors to Check For! 8 Common Spelling Errors to Check For! Spelling in English can be tricky. There are tons of words that arent pronounced the way they are written, as well as pairs of words that sound the same but mean different things! Here are seven common spelling mistakes, along with rules to help you remember them. 1. I Before E Except After C In words like sieve and believe, the i comes before the e. However, in words like receive and ceiling, the e goes first since it comes directly after a c. Watch out, though! There are exceptions to this rule, such as seize, weird and caffeine. 2. Necessary Necessary has one c and a double s. You can use this mnemonic to remember how to spell this one: On a shirt, it is necessary to have one collar and two sleeves! 3. Alot This is not a word! It should always be a lot (with a space between the two words). 4. Separate Many people spell this seperate, so just remember: Theres a rat in separate! 5. Familiar Some people spell this one familier, so keep the following in mind: That liar looks familiar! 6. Exaggerate Its easy to get confused about whether there should be one g or two in exaggerate. Try using the following as a reminder: George and Graham always exaggerate! 7. Rhythm Rhythm is a tricky word because it doesnt have any vowels. Luckily, theres an acronym that helps (where the first letter of each word spells out the word we need to remember): Rhythm Helps Your Two Hips Move. 8. Affect and Effect Try to remember that affect describes the action and is a verb, whereas effect describes the result and is a noun: My early experiences affected my later choices in life. The fire had a devastating effect on London. Making up little memory aids like these can really help your spelling, especially if you always get some words wrong. However, if you want to make sure that your work is completely perfect, why not send it to the experts for checking? Well even proofread a 500-word sample for free to make sure that you are pleased with our standards of work.

Laud Humphries was ordained an Episcopalian Essays

Laud Humphries was ordained an Episcopalian Essays Laud Humphries was ordained an Episcopalian Essay Laud Humphries was ordained an Episcopalian Essay Brief 193592 Laud Humphreys was ordained an Episcopalian priest in 1955, and worked to wipe out, amongst other things, racial privilege. In 1960 he married, and later had two kids. He left the priesthood and, in 1965, undertook alumnus sociology surveies at Washington University. In 1968 he submitted a Ph.D. thesis entitledTearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places’. In 1974, he become the first sociologist to out himself’ declaring his homosexualism. Subsequently, he divorced his married woman and co-habited with his protege , Brian Miller, until his decease in 1988. [ 1 ] His thesis is doubtless every bit ill-famed as it is celebrated and it is impossible to set up the impact of his research and the ethical arguments engendered without contextualising his work on many foreparts. Humphreys’ work is associated with the sociological descriptive anthropology of the Second Chicago School, in peculiar the strand concentrating on aberrant functions. The intent of Humphreys’ survey was to dispute what he regarded every bit dangerous myths’ about work forces who sought impersonal sexual experiences ( trades ) in public public toilets, known, in the subculture, as teashops [ 2 ] . Not merely was Humphreys’ capable affair illegal, it was besides stigmatising a major sociological hot subject during the sixtiess and 1970s. Humphreys set out to set up the demographic of the work forces who visited the teashops, to set up that homosexual work forces suffered non because of their biological abnormalcy but because of societal rejection, and farther, that impersonal sexual brushs of this sort were victimless crimes’ the tackling of which wasted the resources of the governments, and prevented the decrease of offenses affecting genuine victim s. As befitted his symbolic interactionist attack, Humphreys became a participant perceiver within his ain survey, following the function of Peeping Tom and sentinel or watch-queen’ . This function required that he alert those prosecuting in homoerotic Acts of the Apostless of nearing persons, potentially jurisprudence enforcement officers. Humphreys observed that fellatio was the most common signifier of homoerotic act. The act was by and large impersonally performed, with small or no conversation, and the placement of the histrions tended to happen as a consequence of age differences between the brace. The fact that these work forces were engaged in illegal activity meant that by default Humphreys was an illegal confederate. Humphreys took a little figure of his topic into his assurance, work forces he called co-operative respondents’ , and explained that as a sociologist his intent was to analyze their sexual behavior. gt ; From these few, he extracted information about their private lives and their behavioral motives. These work forces, nevertheless, were non thought to be representative of the teashop trade as a whole, because they appeared more sociable and educated, on norm. Because of the impersonal nature of the activity he observed, Humphreys found it hard to set up dealingss of trust and assurance and hence sneakily recorded the license home bases of a farther 100 work forces. Using their home base inside informations he fraudulently obtained their references. A twelvemonth subsequently, Humphreys visited 50 of these work forces in their places. He was carefully disguised and posed as a wellness service market research worker and asked inquiries about their personal life. As a consequence of his fieldwork Humphreys established that merely 14 % of the work forces who engaged in teashop trades were bona fide members of the gay-subculture. Over half the work forces observed were married and populating with their married womans, and a farther tierce were consecutive work forces in unhappy matrimonies. A big minority were bisexual, merrily married, knowing and economically stable respectable members of their community. Over two-thirds had a military background. This information destroyed bing stereotypes environing male-male sex in impersonal topographic points: these work forces were non dramatically different from the remainder of the American population. Most of the topics were in fact so respectable, so spiritual and so family-oriented that Humphreys argued that the Bible on the tabular array and the flag on the wall were declarative of concealed aberrance. He coined the phrase the breastplate of righteousness’ to bespeak the character such work forces adopted to deviate attending off from their aberrant behavior. Possibly, the most interesting of hisTearoom Trade’findings is the by and large reactionist nature of the political relations held by those he observed coupled with their absolute need to conform. Lorna Simpson believes, in the same manner that Humphreys evaluated the behavior of the teashops, perceivers of the sociologist himself were entitled to make their ain decisions about his sexual orientation as a consequence of his active engagement with the trades. For Simpson, it is non possible to readTearoom Trades’without prejudice, nor without appreciating how deceptive visual aspects can be. For Simpson a cardinal portion of apprehension and appreciating the value of Humphreys’ work is basically in contextualising to underscore the inability of generalized cognition to supply dependable or accurate decisions [ 3 ] . Humphreys’ work is clearly of some importance. Informal surveies indicate that his research contributed to a decrease in the usage of constabulary section resources in the battle against victimless crimes’ . Observers might reason that this, in itself, is a societal benefit. It is besides of import to observe that his thesis contributed to of import alterations in the topographic point of societal scientific discipline within society – alterations which spawned a theoretical move off from psychological science towards sociology and a practical displacement from pathology to activism. Around the clip of Humphreys’ research, homosexual rights militants petitioned to hold homosexualism removed from the DSM: a move that sought institutional elucidation that homosexualism was non a psychological upset. Some sociologists began to reject biological or Freudian positions of gender and looked towards sociology to supply positions that combined the societal with the person. To be a sexual being in the 1970s meant to interact with another sexually. For these sociologists the societal and the sexual were to a great extent influenced by each other, and theories which talked about homoerotic Acts of the Apostless merely as instinctual or unprompted were experientially discredited by work such as that undertaken by Humphreys. But this is non the sum sum of Humphreys’ sociological influence: much of which occurred indirectly because of the contention environing his workandhis life. Humphreys had dedicated his thesis to his married woman and kids, and so, this is portion of what made the book so provocative – the writer cast himself as an Episcopalian priest and a merrily married heterosexual male parent of two. Humphreys was frequently called upon to asseverate his heterosexual certificates, and was attacked by the sociologist Sagarin as being one of a figure of practicians who worked within the homosexual caucuses and yet hid behind the safety of married womans and kids, whilst at the same clip urged others to come out of the closet’ [ 4 ] . Humphreys repeatedly avowed his heterosexual position, and it was, hence, slightly dry that in 1980 he left his married woman for a adult male. Biographers of Humphreys suggest thathewas marginalized because he investigated expressed sexual behavi or – the sort which invited looks of moralistic disgust ; because he advocated societal alteration ; because of his gender orientation and the fact that he entered graduate school and took up research instead tardily in life ; because his work, including Teashop Trades’was accessible to the general reader and eventually for his unpleasant behavior, stemming partially from his alcohol addiction. Some critics objected to his usage of covert engagement as merely an extension of his professional opportunism and on an abstract degree questioned whether his work made it more hard for future sociologists to research trade behavior because of his misrepresentation. How would a doubting homosexual and sapphic community receive practicians wishing to research their civilization in hereafter? All of the above may good hold been true, but it besides true that Humphreyswork, whilst doubtless of import, was besides marginalised because of the inquiries raised by his fieldwork moralss. His was non the merely survey to raise such issues during this period – the work of Wendell Johnson, Stanley Milgram, Phillip Zimbardo et Al. all contributed to a monolithic displacement in ethical considerations within sociology. The work of these sociologists catalysed non merely dialogue about the function of moralss within ethnographic fieldwork, but besides the political deductions of control. It is of import to observe that at some flat sociological research is ever ethically imperfect. Scientific and experimental tools are employed to happen the truth, force alteration or inquiry premises, and this frequently consequences in a power battle where inequalities are created even in state of affairss where superficial consensus antecedently existed. It besides can non be said that there is such a thing as harmless research, as topics will ever be impacted psychologically, socially, economically or physically. In order to delve down beneath the superficial, the privateness of topics must be compromised and a research worker, hence, feats those he observes. It is of import to read theTearoom Trades’with such an credence of the imperfectness of ethnographic fieldwork. Despite this, critics argue that Humphreys’ work is flawed by his neglect for even the basic renters of fieldwork. The tenseness caused by being a participant perceiver within his ain research is something which in subsequently enlarged editions of his thesis Humphreys regretted. Initially Humphreys stated, †¦my determination was to go on the pattern of the field survey in go throughing as a deviant†¦.there are good grounds for following this method of Participant Observation.’ [ 5 ] For Humphreys any other attack would exemplify the simple yet inevitable logic of the Hawthorne Effect, in kernel. To wear a button stating I am a watchbird, watching you’ into a tea room would immediately extinguish all action except the flushing of lavatories and the exiting of all present.’ [ 6 ] Further, †¦let us presume that a few work forces could be found to go on their sexual activity whilst under observation. How normal’ could that activity be? ’ [ 7 ] Sociologist such as Polsky had earlier highlighted the tensenesss which Humphreys subsequently recognised as being built-in within his work, You damned good better non feign to be one of them’ because they will prove this claim out†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦you will acquire sucked into participant’observation of the kind you would instead non set about, or you will be exposed, with still greater negative consequences.’ [ 8 ] Covert processs flout the construct of informed consent. Some sociologists would reason that without conformed consent Humphreys committed rational larceny: larceny of informations from the really subjects he observed. If one subscribes to the vulnerable population theoretical account of research one could reason that this larceny is in the cause of a greater good and that it is merely impossible to detect naturalistically whilst at the same clip obtaining the consent of those observed. Seven old ages after the publication of theTearoom Trades’Ditton [ 9 ] suggested that Humphreys’ findings were likely to hold a detrimental consequence on the behavior of people within the subculture he studied. Humphreys shone a limelight on a universe which was shadowy through pick ; a universe, the dwellers of which preferred to travel approximately unnoticed. Simply by advertising his research Humphreys denied his topics control of their ain universe. Linked to this, many sociologists would reason that Humphreys’ methods are, like those employed overtly, invisibly reactive. It does non count whether his engagement within the trades was damaging or helpful, covert or open, the unintended consequence of Humphreys’ interaction is to consequence the behavior of the group, so the smaller the group, the greater the consequence. Unfortunately, the really nature of Humphreys’ observation invaded the privateness of the topics he observed ; particularly the privateness of the great bulk of topics he chose non to uncover his true individuality to. His ulterior visits to some of those he observed, besides unethically invaded the societal standing of his topics. What would hold happened if one of the topics recognised Humphreys? Humphreys frequently questioned these work forces with their married womans present, what sort of matrimonial agitation might some of the topic revelations have initiated? What about the personal autonomy of the work forces involved? Do sociologists hold a duty to take the manner in the field of human relationships and if so do covert methods merely betray trust and do it hard for sociologists to take portion in exemplar human interactions? On this topic, Nicholas Von Hoffman of the Washington Post provinces, No information is valuable plenty to obtain by pinching off at personal autonomy, and that is true no affair who is making the gnawing.’ [ 10 ] Gary Alan Fines, an Anthropologist at the University of Georgia, suggests that Humphries work exemplifies one of the 10 prevarications of the ethnographer: the being of the honest ethnographer, and is possibly the zenith of the absence of honestness within this field [ 11 ] . Fines is at strivings to submits, that despite Humphreys’ fraudulence in tracking down his topics, and the false pretensions under which he interviewed them, there is no grounds of any injury caused. Sociologists Homan and Warwick [ 12 ] find this premiss interesting, and tentatively suggest that Humphreys’ research merely exemplifies the theoretical possibility of what if’ injury. They pose the inquiry can insiders harm insiders? ’ Fines goes farther and inquiries why honestness within research is so vitally of import, particularly if the ends of the research embody societal public-service corporation. Consequently, we are invariably misdirecting each other, for ends that we feel are worthy, or in state of affairss where we judge it most convenient. In contrast, Kai Erikson [ 13 ] argues that come ining scenes in which 1 has no right to be and professing specious claims of belonging make non reflect good on the morality of the profession and moreover that hidden research with cloaked observation casts the ethnographer in the same place as the espionage agent.’ Harmonizing to Erikson this pattern illustrates a blazing neglect for the human rights of topics non to be deceived, particularly where the misrepresentation sees the spy’ as the major donee. For Humphreys, the picks he made approximately whom to confide in, how much information to confide and the sorts of information to confide were determinations taken from a place of power and information control, and for many critics, his research is equivalent to an maltreatment of that power. It is possibly enlightening to research whether Eriksson’s theories about legitimacy clasp weight given that, whilst as a heterosexual married male parent of two, Humphreys’ claims to belong to the trades may hold appeared bogus, yet the disclosures of his true sexual orientation certainly perplex the state of affairs and do his initial misrepresentation appear much more than superficial. Further, one might inquire whether Erikson is accurate in his suggestion that Humphreys was the major donee of his ain research. It is widely accepted that the informations derived from his qualitative work impacted upon both social positions of homosexualism, and the tolerance of homosexual patterns, every bit good as policies of jurisprudence enforcement in covering with basically victimless offenses. Although it can non be claimed to be by and large true, it is right to state that at that place exists within Humphreys work a paradox sing his pick of covert engagement. Humphreys’ research developed during an epoch in which favoritism and the stigma of belonging to a subculture strongly motivated practicians within the field: yet the very nature of covert engagement discriminates against the defenceless and powerless. Warwick suggests that the adult male in the teashop could non ( would non? ) fight back against the research levelled against him, whereas similar research analyzing a voyeuristic chauffeur for a outstanding American household, for illustration, would surely hold involved ( or at least allowed for ) legitimate and unashamed revenge of some sort. [ 14 ] As a direct consequence of the work of Humphreys and other co-workers working in similar Fieldss or using similar methods, America passed the National Research Act of 1974 which established their modern IRB system for modulating research affecting human topics. In 1978, and as a consequence of the Act, the National Commission released the Belmont Report which detailed the cardinal ethical rules that should steer human topics research. In 1981 these guidelines became a federal regulation. The three rules contained in the Belmont Report are: regard for individuals ; beneficence and justness [ 15 ] . For this, if nil else,Tearoom Trades’is of immense importance and, despite onslaughts upon his personality and personal ethical motives and his ethically questionable fieldwork, we must accept that in set uping duologue with and between this sub-culture, Humphreys was instrumental in the legitimisation of sapphic and cheery surveies, and the eroding of the construct of homosexualism as a signifier of aberrance. Bibliography Belmont Report:Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research. 1979. Berry, D.M.Internet Research: Privacy, Ethical motives and Alienation – An Open Source Approach.Surveies in Political and Social Thought. 2002. De Armendi, Nicole.Lorna Simpson’s Public Sex Series: The Voyeuristic Presence and the Embodied Figure’s Absence.’Virginia Commonwealth University, 1995. Ditton, Jason.Part-time Crime: An Ethnography of Fiddling and Pilferage.London: Macmillan.1977. Erikson, Kai.A Remark on Cloaked Observation in Sociology. JSL vol. 14, 1967. Fines, Gary Allan.Ten prevarications of Ethnography. Keynote Address. University of Georgia 1992. Galliher, John F. , Wayne H. Brekhus, and David P. Keys.Laud Humphrey: Prophet of Homosexuality and Sociology.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2004. Humphreys, Laud.Teashop Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places.Chicago: Aldine. 1970. Homan, R.Ethical motives of Social Research.London: Macmillan 1991. Livesy, Chris. A’ Level Sociology: Theory and Methods: Participant Observation www.sociology.org.uk Penn, R, Professor. , Soothill, K, Professor.Ethical Issues in Social Inquiry: the Enemy Within?, Presentation: Qualitative Research in New Ethical Times Conference. Cardiff University. 2006. Polsky, Ned.Streetwalkers, Beats and Others. Chicago: Aldine 1969. Thomas, J.When Cyber Research goes amiss: The Ethical motives of the Rimm Cyberporn’ Study.The Informant Society. 2000. Tolich, Martin.An Ethical Iceberg: Do connected person’ confidentiality warrant vulnerable individual position?IIPEA/AAPAE Conference. Brisbane. 2002. Von Hoffman, Nicholas.WashingtonPost, 1982. Warwick, D.P.Teashop Trade: Means and Ends in Social Research.Chicago: Aldine 1975. 1

Demand Estimation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Demand Estimation - Assignment Example Such a product according to economic theory is said to exhibit somewhat elastic demand relative to that of similar products in the market (Graves, & Sexton, 2009). Consequently, the owner of the low-calorie, frozen microwavable food product may need to worry less about rivals in the market since the pricing strategies have a negligible impact on his products. The income elasticity is estimated at 1.62. Such a result is an indication that a 1 percent positive change in the average incomes of the consumers of the product would lead to 1.62 percent increase in the quantity demanded. Theorists argue that such a degree of responsiveness due to changes in consumer income is elastic (Saez, Slemrod, & Giertz, 2012). In line with this, the firm can take the step increasing the price of the commodity if the incomes of the consumers are increased. The elasticity of advertisement is estimated at 0.1 implying that a unit increase in the funds spent on advertisement results to 0.11 increase in the quantity demanded. The result that the degree of responsiveness of the quantity demanded to changes in the intensity of the advertisement is relatively elastic. As such, increases in the level of advertisement do not justify increases in prices by the firm since it is possible that such price have the potential to scare away the consumers (Graves, & Sexton, 2009). In relation to the microwave ovens in the region, the elasticity is estimated at 0.07. Despite the food product being a complement to the microwave oven, a 1 percent elevation in the quantity of ovens in the region only increases the quantity of the food product by merely 0.07 percent. Concerning this, the degree of responsiveness of the quantity needed in relation to variations in the price of the oven is inelastic. The management is better off ignoring the effect of the changes in the price of the ovens when strategizing on

Stone Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Stone - Essay Example Gold nugget is a mineral because of the characteristics it possesses. One it is a naturally occurring substance found in gold ore and has a specific gravity of around 15.5-19.3. Gold nugget has a specific color, which is yellow in color (Marshall, 50). Quartz is a mineral because it is naturally occurring in sedimentary rocks. Quartz has different colors but is mostly range from clear to it translucent color. Its luster is vitreous. Amber be classified a minerals because they a combination of tree resin and other natural occurring things such as plant and animal materials. It has a color range from yellow to orange and a specific gravity of 1.1. Glacial ice forms due to a lot of icefall and slow melting during the summer hence it solidifies to a glacier. So a glacier can be categorized as a mineral formed by only one mineral and because of its defined formula and structure (Marshall, 60) Ruby is a mineral that is naturally occurring and is mined. Obsidian is a volcanic glass where it is pushed up as an extrusive igneous rock, so cannot be described as a mineral. Cubic zirconia is a mineral. It is synthetic in nature and was discovered in monoclinic

The Opening Scenes of Othello, King Lear and Macbeth Essay Example for Free

The Opening Scenes of Othello, King Lear and Macbeth Essay The influences of feminine powers from the Shakespearean plays, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth, portrayed during the opening scenes have affected the courses of male instincts and literary arguments throughout the play. In this study, the emphasis is given to the powers of feminine influences portrayed in the opening scenes and the effects of these to male characters and arguments throughout the play. The three plays of Shakespeare have shown significant interests on how females provided influential to seemingly manipulative roles throughout the play. In the opening scene of the play Macbeth, the feminine force of Lady Macbeth only becomes evident in the latter scenes (Act I: Scene V), but her character and roles in the play have shown immense manipulation and creative enticement that lures the role of her husband Macbeth from general to king. Lady Macbeth has shown a personality of a domineering wife that pave the way for her husband’s royal disposition. In the story, her presence and feminine influence are evidently illustrated by her manipulation of her husband’s decisions. The powers of Lady Macbeth portray the similarity towards the militaristic domination of her husband’s task in the military, yet also give contrast to their roles and dispositions, which emphasizes her enticement. On the other hand, the feminine influences present in King Lear are evidently multi-faceted through the roles of characters, Goneril, Regan and Cordelia. Shakespeare is able to centralize the literary course through the discreet and indirect manipulation of character of Cordelia, the youngest daughter of King Lear. In opening scenes this play, the feminine roles are very much intertwined with the concept of sibling rivalry and patriarchal inclinations, which is more patterned to â€Å"Electra† complex of Freudian psychosexual theory. The character of Cordelia has shown her distinct attachments towards the King of France as her husband and the King Lear as her father, while the two sisters, Goneril and Regan, implicate love towards themselves and their husband’s disposition to the society. Cordelia’s depiction of feminine influence is the main emphasis of the discussion due to her distinct attachments to significant male characters as well as her diverse portrayal in the opening scenes of the play. Lastly, the play of Othello gives rise to the character of Desdemona who have entangled the hearts of two gentlemen, Othello and Roderigo. In the opening scenes, it is already indicated that Roderigo lost the hand of Desdemona to his competitor Othello, who actually became the husband of Desdemona. In the novel, the roles of women, including Desdemona, Emilia and Bianca, have become the turning point of argument among men. Shakespeare has evidently utilized the imagery of womanhood in order to create the sense of love rivalries, issues of jealousy, scenarios of betrayal and the instinctive manly lust linked to their pride as military personnel and as male human being. The feminine influence is very much intense and evident even in the opening scenes of the play; however, it portrays a different perspective in the form of love triangle between Othello, Desdemona and Roderigo. Discussion The Opening Scenes of Othello The setting of the opening scene involves the two characters Roderigo and Iago arguing about the secret marriage that occurred between Othello, Roderigo’s literary rival, and Desdemona, the woman who captivated Roderigo. During the first scenes, Roderigo acts furiously and blatantly exaggerates his hatred and defeat towards Iago due to the fact that Desdemona can no longer be with him. Even from the very start, the character of Desdemona is already causing an indirect influence towards the male characters through the depiction of erotic triangle between Othello, herself and Roderigo. In the advent of Roderigo’s jealousy, he is easily manipulated by Iago’s lying tongue that causes them to further lay down their conflict to the Desdemona’s father, Senator Brabantio. â€Å"Iago: Call up her father, rouse him: make after him, poison his delight, proclaim him in the streets; incense her kinsmen and, though he in a fertile climate dwell, plague him with flies: though that his joy be joy, yet throw such changes of vexation ont, as it may lose some colour. (Act I: Scene I)† Brabantio, being influenced again by the role of Desdemona as his daughter, becomes protective over her and enrages as he learn the marriage between his pure bred English daughter to a moor. Othello is known as the noble moor in the novel; hence, creating issues of classicism in terms of racial origin. Despite Othello’s military rank (General), he is not welcomed with full acceptance by Desdemona’s patriarchs. â€Å"Brabantio: It is too true an evil: gone she is; and whats to come of my despised time is nought but bitterness. Now, Roderigo, Where didst thou see her? O unhappy girl! With the Moor, sayst thou? Who would be a father! How didst thou know twas she? O she deceives me (Act I: Scene I). † Literary angles would consider the enticement and manipulation brought by Iago; however, the clear spot on Desdemona, being the subject of argument among men in the opening scenes, is the clearest influence of feminine powers. Brabantio’s patriarchal protectiveness and Roderigo’s lustful intent insist to revoke the clinging of Othello to Desdemona; however, even with progressive accusations (e. g. witchcraft, unreasonable seductions from Othello, etc. , Othello is able to defend himself and his love for Desdemona. Prior to the frank arguments between Brabantio’s allies and Othello, the noble moor already declared his affection towards Desdemona. â€Å"Othello: But that I love the gentle Desdemona, I would not my unhoused free condition put into circumscription and confine for the seas worth(Act I: Scene II). † Shakespeare portrays a different power of female captivity in the initial conflicts of opening scenes. Even without the appearance of Desdemona in the opening scenes of the play, her presence and manipulation over the male characters are already evident. The protectiveness of Brabantio, the jealous love of Roderigo and Othello’s proof of love for Desdemona have all indicated a tremendous male influence through a simple decision made by Desdemona, which is her marriage with Othello. Evidently, the female character of Desdemona invisibly influences the subjects of arguments (e. g. Iago and Roderigo, Brabantio against Othello, and Roderigo against Othello) present in the opening scenes of the play. The Opening Scenes of King Lear In the play of King Lear, the female parties under the portrayals of the three sisters, Goneril, Regan and King Leer’s most favourite, Cordelia. The play opens with King Lear and his daughters providing their best interpretations of their patriarchal affinity. Goneril, being the eldest and married daughter, casts well-stated praises for the king but less affinity for a father. â€Å"Goneril: †¦No less than life, with grace, health, beauty, honour; as much as child eer loved, or father found; a love that makes breath poor, and speech unable;†¦ (Act I: Scene 1). † Meanwhile, Regan, the second daughter, resembles more of her eldest sister’s remarks although, she places more emphasis on the insufficiencies of Goneril’s description. It is a higher bid, a bold comparative and an assertion that Regan can love better than the eldest. Regan mentions that, â€Å"In my true heart â€Å"†¦I find she names my very deed of love; only she comes too short: that I profess myself an enemy to all other joys, which the most precious square of sense possesses; and find I am alone felicitate in your dear highness love (Act I: Scene I)†, which gives the hint of her total love for King Lear. Shakespeare’s King Lear somehow illustrates the role of women to please men of the contemporary European society simply through words, which sometimes even blinds them of the real picture. However, despite the alluring statements provided by the two sisters, Shakespeare decides to have the youngest, Cordelia, as the turning point of feminine enticement in the story, which even influenced the entire literary course of King Lear. Upon the first entrance of King Lear, a significant symbolism of favoritism has already been portrayed for his youngest daughter. His concern over her is vastly impressive and evident as he acknowledges the non-implied burden of Cordelia’s suitors, King France and Lord of Burgundy. However, this affection of King Lear has been seemingly declined by Cordelia during her turn to state her love for the king. Corderlia’s thoughts assures to her confidence that her tongue is not match for her affection towards her father. â€Å"Cordelia: Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave, my heart into my mouth: I love your majesty according to my bond; nor more nor less. (Act1: Scene 1)† This is turning point plays the most significant feminine influences over males in the opening scenes of the play. King Lear becomes enraged, disowns his daughter and leaves her to the King of France to marry. However, Cordelia still provides the greatest affinity towards the king compared to her two sisters. The feminine influences of the three daughters to their father provide a multi-faceted approach. Goneril and Regan compete for their interest in the king’s inheritance, but their intents show selfish and masked affinity. On the other hand, Cordelia manifests a strong attachment to her father. Despite of the knowledge that failure to gratify the king through word praises might cause the lost of her part in the kingdom shares, she still preferred to announce her honest verdict. In the opening scene, King Lear, with the instinctive manly characters, is easily manipulated by the feminine lingual enticement, which even blinds his site from truth. King Lear prioritizes his pride and instinct as a man, which blinds him from the real identities and intentions of her daughters. The linkages of the sisters towards the king are related to the patriarchal attachments that should be natural to such familial relationships. The Electra complex depicted in the play and the process on how feminine enticement can manipulate male’s decision is the main influence of feminine roles throughout the play. The Opening Scenes of Macbeth In the Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the feminine influence is greatly portrayed by the role of Lady Macbeth over her husband, Macbeth. In the story, the three witches have provided their prediction of kingly lineage to Banquo, a military general and Macbeth’s best friend; however, as Lady Macbeth learns of the predictions, she decides to use this together with her husband as an opportunity to own the crown. Lady Macbeth is able to convince Macbeth that the only way to the royal lineage is to eliminate the current monarch, King Duncan. During the conversations of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, the manipulation of Lady Macbeth becomes evident in her efforts to convince Macbeth for the killing plot. â€Å"Lady Macbeth: And when goes hence? Macbeth: To-morrow, as he purposes. Lady Macbeth: O, never shall sun that morrow see! .(Act 1: Scene V) Lady Macbeth: What cannot you and I perform upon the unguarded Duncan? What not put upon his spongy officers, who shall bear the guilt of our great quell? † (Act 1: Scene VII). The feminine cunningness of Lady Macbeth has entices her husband for her plot of putting Macbeth in the royal sit. She is even confident to take the overall burden for the sake of her husband’s new position in the royal chambers as evident to her statements, â€Å"Lady Macbeth: †¦to alter favour ever is to fear: Leave all the rest to me†¦ (Act I: Scene V). The influence of Lady Macbeth is also the main weapon that she chooses in order to fulfill the plot of killing. She decides to lure the king to her enticement prior to the killing and, with that, her cunning statements begin to manifest. â€Å"Duncan: Give me your hand; conduct me to mine host: we love him highly, and shall continue our graces towards him. By your leave, hostess (Act 1: Scene VI)† The female influences portrayed in the character of Lady Macbeth illustrate the manipulative and non-offensive strategy of female mind in directing the male’s decision according to their preferences. Evidently, Lady Macbeth manifests a domineering attitude towards her husband, Macbeth, whom she even considers as innocent and helpless in some non-implied way. Considering the pride of men by nature and the manly instinct suggesting the negation of female position, especially during the contemporary European society, Macbeth is enticed to abide the plans and plots of Lady Macbeth. Moreover, as illustrated in the opening scenes, Macbeth is the one who shows hesitancy over the plot of his wife. â€Å"Macbeth: If we should fail? Lady Macbeth: We fail! But screw your courage to the sticking-place, and well not fail. When Duncan is asleepWhereto the rather shall his days hard journey soundly invite himhis two chamberlains (Act I: Scene VII)† It is important to note that the culture and tradition from the time of Macbeth’s writing prohibits the insubordination of males by females; however, Lady Macbeth is able to create an illusion of caring character to mask her manipulation. Somehow, the concept maybe contradicting to the prevailing culture of their time, but the strength of feminine influence and dominancy is very much evident in the role of Lady Macbeth to the point that even Duncan acknowledges her bravery. Following the latter scenes of the play, it is Lady Macbeth who works behind the kingly figure of Macbeth indicating the powers placed by Shakespeare in the woman’s tongue in his Macbeth. Analysis of the Three Plays In the three plays of Shakespeare analyzed in this study, the play Othello mentions the power of Desdemona’s decision in marrying the noble moor, while Goneril, Regan and Cordelia use the feminine touch of patriarchal influence in order to create significant impact in King Lear’s decisions for his kingdom, and lastly, Lady Macbeth who issues direct but properly strategize dominancy and manipulation over her husband, Macbeth. These women in the following three plays have all shown significant feminine influences towards the male characters of the plays. Despite the different forms and strategies, the feminine image in the contemporary period of society has always become a part of major influential force. The portrayals of feminine influences have all been cited from the openings scenes of the play, and yet, each of the female character in these plays has already provided their significant place in the literary course. In consideration of Othello’s Desdemona, even without her initial appearance, her single decision of marrying Othello has initiated the conflicts between three male personas, Roderigo, Brabantio and Othello. The conflict between these males stand in the motives of racial discrimination of Brabantio for Othello’s Moroccan origin, and Roderigo’s desire for Desdemona that is halted and ended by their secret marriage. In the opening scenes of Othello, Desdemona has not even mentioned any words but only the decision of secret marriage, and yet the uprising between the three main characters has already climbed the higher intensity. Meanwhile, the sisters and their king, from the play King Lear? are provided with the scenario of lingual enticements. Goneril and Regan are able to entice their father through their praises full of masked thoughts. However, despite of their masked or seemingly unreal feminine allurement, Goneril and Regan are given portions of the kingdom under the King’s verdict. Meanwhile, the youngest, Cordelia offers the most honest answer he can give, which is the love of expression than love through words. However, due to Corderlia’s failure in enticing the male pride and instinct of King Lear, she has been banished from the throne including her right as the daughter of the king. The feminine influence being portrayed in this novel is on the aspect of pleasing the male pride, which holds the key in manipulating their superiority and grants – as with the portrayal of Goneril and Regan. Lastly, the dominance of Lady Macbeth towards her husband Macbeth has led to their plot of killing the current minister, Duncan, and subduing the kingdom under Macbeth’s leading. The portrayal of Lady Macbeth has provided the illustration of the aggressive form of female manipulation through a well-masked intent towards rule and power. Conclusion The feminine influences of the characters Desdemona, the three sisters and Lady Macbeth have all illustrated diverse forms on how females in the contemporary plays of Shakespeare can influence the male society. As for Othello’s wife, Desdemona, she is able to influence the uprising of the male characters in the opening scenes through her simple decision of marrying the racially discriminated individual, Othello, the noble moor. Meanwhile, the two sisters, Goneril and Regan, are able to entice their patriarch’s affection leading to the favor of having the kingdom’s inheritance. Cordelia, on the other hand, symbolizes how men’s pride can be blinded by false feminine allure, which sometimes hinders male’s judgments of truth. Lastly, Lady Macbeth who provides the portrayal of dominant manipulation over her husband in order to attain higher positions through the royal crown.

The Next Great Wall Essay -- Encryption Technology Essays

The Next Great Wall The attacks of September 11, 2001 on the World Trade Center triggered the passing of the USA Patriot Act â€Å"to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes."1 It passed quickly and with little debate. Soon, encryption of information became a topic to address and efforts took place to allow the government backdoor access to anything encrypted by products developed within the United States. This generated much controversy and was opposed by many organizations. It did not take long before the supporters of these encryption bills backed down. The Chinese government, on the other hand, did not go through such a process. Restrictions on encryption technology imported to or developed within China have been put forth. Their attempts at such control contrast what the United States considers is a denial of our rights to privacy even when addressing national security. The U.S. has acknowledged the significance of supporting free encryption policies while China’s restrictions have shown they are even more limiting, unenforceable and morally wrong in how it affects its citizens as well as its international neighbors. U.S. Policies Addressing encryption technology over the last 5 years has been a challenge for establishing policy in the United States. Development of advanced encryption technology heightened towards the end of the 20th century and questions on its usage soon came into play. On February 23, 1999, the Security and Freedom Through Encryption (SAFE) Act was introduced â€Å"to affirm the rights of United States persons to use and sell encryption and to relax export controls on encryption."2 In addition, o... ...urnal. (back) Moore, Tim (2003), IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs Draft 5.1, Retrieved February 7, 2004, from the World Wide Web: IEEE (MS Word Document). (back) CNET Asia Staff (2003), China Wi-Fi codes to be controlled by 11 firms, Retrieved January 25, 2004, from the World Wide Web: CNet News. (back) Freeman, Charles W. III (2004), Deputy Assistant USTR Feb. 5 Testimony, Retrieved February 7, 2004 from the World Wide Web: USInfo.State.Gov. (back) Shim, Richard (2003), China Implements new Wi-Fi security standard, Retrieved January 25, 2004 from the World Wide Web: CNet News. (back) Shim, Richard (2003), China Implements new Wi-Fi security standard, Retrieved January 25, 2004 from the World Wide Web: CNet News. (back) Gossett, Sherie (2002), e-Freedom fighters forge new weapon, Retrieved February 7, 2004 from the World Wide Web: World Net Daily. (back)